I agree with Patrick. period Pieter van den Briel, owner 't Fortuyn, 1753-1759. Later the brand was used by his widow until 1771. I suspect it originally came with a lid. If I understand correctly, you still have the lids. Personally, I think they look better as a vase and it's a pity that there is damage due to drilling, among other things. these vases may carry a history with them.
Ik ben het eens met Patrick. periode Pieter van den Briel, eigenaar 't Fortuyn, 1753-1759. Later werd het merk nog tot 1771 gebruikt door zijn weduwe.
Ik vermoed dat er origineel een deksel bijhoorde. Als ik het goed begrijp heeft u de deksels nog. Persoonlijk vind ik ze mooier als vaas en jammer dat er beschadigingen zijn door onder andere het boren. deze vazen dragen wellicht een geschiedenis met zich mee.
kind regards Franky
Verdict:
Delftware
Analysis:
Delftware, made between 1620 – 1850
Only tin-glazed earthenware made in Delft between 1620 - 1850 is referred to as traditional Delftware.
Read more
Tin-glazed earthenware
Earthenware with a glaze to which tin oxide has been added to make it opaque white. Delftware produced before 1850 is always covered with a tin glaze.
Read more
Hand-painted
An important characteristic of authentic Delftware is that it is hand-painted. Printing techniques do not occur on this earthenware.
Read more
Mark of a Delft pottery/factory
In the 19th century, a financial incentive arose to sell more new earthenware as antique Delftware, sometimes even bearing fake Delft factory marks.
Read more
Merk:
VB
It has been a while since this post. Hopefully this information is still relevant to you. I agree with Franky and Patrick.
Add new comment
Only logged in users can post comments Log in or register to post comments
Reacties 3
Dear Sarah,
Values are not discussed on this website but the vases seem authentic Delftware to me: https://delftsaardewerk.nl/merk/vb
Kind regards, Patrick
Dear Sarah,
I agree with Patrick. period Pieter van den Briel, owner 't Fortuyn, 1753-1759. Later the brand was used by his widow until 1771. I suspect it originally came with a lid. If I understand correctly, you still have the lids. Personally, I think they look better as a vase and it's a pity that there is damage due to drilling, among other things. these vases may carry a history with them.
Ik ben het eens met Patrick. periode Pieter van den Briel, eigenaar 't Fortuyn, 1753-1759. Later werd het merk nog tot 1771 gebruikt door zijn weduwe.
Ik vermoed dat er origineel een deksel bijhoorde. Als ik het goed begrijp heeft u de deksels nog. Persoonlijk vind ik ze mooier als vaas en jammer dat er beschadigingen zijn door onder andere het boren. deze vazen dragen wellicht een geschiedenis met zich mee.
kind regards Franky
Verdict:
Analysis:
Merk:
It has been a while since this post. Hopefully this information is still relevant to you. I agree with Franky and Patrick.
Add new comment
Only logged in users can post comments
Log in or register to post comments